Sep 16

I met with Francois Gossieaux, co-founder and President of Human 1.0, to discuss elements of his book The Hyper-Social Organization: Eclipse Your Competition by Leveraging Social Media. Human 1.0 is a customer strategy firm that helps companies innovate business programs, practices and organizational culture to realize the benefits of social media and Web 2.0. Francois and I discussed the challenges of contemporary marketing organizations and the challenges faced by Chief Marketer Officers as they transition from CMO 1.0 to CMO 2.0. We discussed the difficult tasks of these executives and their need to get out of their silos, suggesting, perhaps, that they spend more time with customer service.

We also attacked the perceived perch of social media. We acknowledged the importance of social media, but analyzed our disbelief that many “experts” in the area actually lack basic social skills. The key to success is understanding the cultural aspects, which is the foundation of both community and social media.

Rob Ciampa

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS
Tagged with:
Aug 16

The Value Proposition Challenge

I love great salespeople. They know their customers’ business needs; they know their products; and – most importantly – they know how to link the two together. And there’s one more: they actively and positively engage marketing. One of the best sales professionals I know is Sean Harris, someone whom I’ve been honored to work with several times over the years.

Not too long ago, after Sean and I went on to different companies, he called me up to vent, which was uncharacteristic for him.

“Rob, I got double-booked after a major client changed a meeting between the executive team and me. I was supposed to speak at an industry event.”

“Sean,” I said, “you deal with this all the time. Just have one of your marketing people speak.”

“That’s the problem, Rob, they can’t.”

“Because of scheduling?” I asked.

“No, because they can’t give the pitch. Even worse, they don’t know the product and can’t interact with customers.”

“You’re kidding, Sean, right?”

“I wish I were, Rob.”

Sean’s dilemma is not at all unusual. Too often, marketers, as well as other people in an organization, can’t deliver their firm’s value proposition. Many can read it, understand it, and possibly write it, but they often stumble when delivering it live, in real-time. We can assume that both marketers and their marketing organizations invest continually in telling their story in the most clear and compelling way, but we’d be wrong. Instead, they’ve invested heavily in social media, while tragically abdicating the community dialogue to inexperienced people who can neither deliver nor comprehend the value proposition. It’s time to address these problems.

Fix #1 – Have marketers spend time on the phone with insides sales or actively participating in sales calls.

I’m sorry, but sitting in the corner, smiling, and saying nothing during a meeting with prospects and customers doesn’t cut it. Marketers need to know how their product or service can solve a customer’s business problem or enable them to penetrate new markets. They need to be business problem solvers and expert consultants. Beyond their job description? Absolutely not. They should be able to handle any challenge that comes their way. That’s where the rubber hits the road and the real marketing begins:

“I don’t need your product.”

“I don’t understand what you just said.”

“Your main competitor does this better.”

“You’re too expensive.”

“What I have is just fine.”

“I don’t see a return on investment that my CFO will approve.”

Ouch.  Am I making this up? Go ask any sales professional if they’ve heard this. See if the marketers give the same answers as the sales team. I’d wager not.

Marketers need real-time, live action feedback to not just be good, but great: great at the value proposition and great at understanding how it addresses customer needs.

The Product or Service Challenge

Marketers also need to understand what their product does or how their services function. They must answer this from a customer perspective. In another piece, I wrote about the importance for marketers to know their products and study the documentation. Though these activities are relevant for marketers, they are more academic and represent only parts of the overall marketing effectiveness equation. Marketers can learn a great deal by spending time in either customer service or in the field to really learn about their product.

My customer service education came from Peter Wolf, now a support manager at IBM. Peter and I worked together several years back at Access360, a Southern California software company. Not only did Peter know exactly what our customers were doing, but his team was equally proficient in knowing them too. Spending time with Peter was a marketing goldmine, especially since our customers loved his services group. Over dinner one night, Peter explained it to me:

“Rob,” he inquired, “who gets paid more: engineers or customer service?”

“Engineers, Peter. I’ve worked on way too many compensation plans to know that,” I responded.

“Exactly, and that’s a huge problem. Customer service is the most important department for most companies, so why do we not treat it that way?” he asked.

Peter went on to explain the rationale and economics behind putting great people in customer service.

  • Customer satisfaction is always world-class. Is great for marketing and sales.
  • Customer retention is never an issue. Ensures profitability and important references.
  • Repeat sales occurs organically. Helps lower the cost of sales and drives revenue.

This was brilliant – truly brilliant. He also described the tight relationship – and respect and collaboration – that occurred among product development, product management, and customer service. All teams were aligned. He even described about how people freely moved between product development and customer service with absolutely no stigma attached. Is there a lesson here?

Fix #2 – Put marketing people in customer service and in the field regularly

Marketers see real live use cases rather than trying to make them up. Marketing can see how customers use the product rather than trying to make it up. Marketers can see genuine customer impact rather than trying to make it up. Marketers can see measurable ROI or rather than trying to make it up.

Conclusion

Sales and customer service are cogs in the marketing wheelSales and customer service are the keys to building a great marketing organization. Alignment between these two disciplines can help fix a marketing organization that might not be fully grounded in the reality of the markets served. There’s another important byproduct: it makes a company more cohesive by more tightly bonding marketing, sales, service, and product. But what about social media and the huge investment so many have made? Perhaps sales and customer service are the keys to fixing that too, but that’s a story for another day.

And what about my friends, Sean and Peter? Now I have a great reason to make some long overdue calls to them. The good part is I know the conversation will be great. Why? Because they both know their customers, which makes them some of the best marketers I know.

Rob Ciampa

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS
Tagged with:
Jan 10

I’m starting to wonder whether an old house is a metaphor for business. Strike the “old” – maybe any house is a metaphor for business. How so?

  • If you ignore it, you’ll pay dearly.
  • No matter how much you plan, something will go wrong.
  • Many people you hire, no matter how much background checking you do, will produce shitwork.

So what’s “shitwork”? Many contemporary definitions (yes, I’m not kidding) define it as something that’s given: trivial, unrewarding, tedious, dirty, and disagreeable chores. I’m going to modify the definition to something that’s received: subpar, shoddy, goods or services that have long-term, negative economic impact.

So what does this have to do with a house? Ask most homeowners about the quality of their houses – especially the things they had to fix – and they’ll tell you about shitwork, without my fancy definition. Let’s look at this more closely.

When I moved to Atlanta several years ago to start a company, I bought a beautiful, well-known-architect-designed home. It was stunning. Within 18 months, all the rooms had to be redone because every square foot of drywall had bulges and cracks from nail pops. The builders didn’t use drywall screws; they used nails, which can’t stay in place as a house naturally contracts and expands. That’s shitwork. I had to redo every wall and ceiling.

Back up North and now living in a 100-year-old Massachusetts home, I had a water pipe let go. Upon inspection, it became clear that a plumber, ten years ago during a renovation, failed to put the new copper piping fully in a coupling before soldering the joint. That’s shitwork. I spent a weekend cleaning it up and fixing it right.

Shoddy Pipe

What about business? No different. As part of a marketing campaign, I hired a firm to do a promotion from one of their “highly-targeted” lists. Though we received a respectable number of leads, our conversion rates were zero. Yes, nada. Nil. I never had this happen before and upon investigation discovered that the vendor didn’t even bother to filter their list based on our criteria. They figured we wouldn’t notice. That’s shitwork. Fortunately, we caught this in time and didn’t pay them.

We can only wonder about the economic (and even environmental) impact of shitwork. Too bad the financial benefit is on the bad vendor or the unethical contractor, but only if they can get away with it. Social media and services such as Angie’s List help, but we still have a long way to go. We’re all busy people, but we can only mitigate the risk if we inspect the work, document it well, and keep a zero-tolerance policy. Whether it’s our home or our business, shitwork is shitwork.

Rob Ciampa

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS
Tagged with:
Jul 19

There’s always a sense of excitement when we drive into a town and find a vibrant and diverse community filled with people and beautiful, occupied storefronts. Too frequently, though, we find the opposite: no people and empty, decrepit storefronts. We then comment, “Geez, this town has seen better days.” And we drive right through, unlikely to return. It’s too bad because with vibrant towns, we stop, get out, open our wallets and keep going back.

The root causes of town distress can fill many, many books, but I’ll generalize: empty storefronts signal something is wrong. In some cases, the causes are macro and out of the control of the town or business owners. Examples include cyclical economic downturns, commerce redirection because of new highways and shopping centers, or broad changes to the industrial or manufacturing base. In the sixties, we tried to counter these macro issues with urban renewal, which yielded questionable results.

Empty Storefront by George Cannon

In other cases, empty storefronts are a result of micro conditions because business owners fail to adapt. Why?

  • They lose the concept of customer service
  • They underestimate the need to market themselves
  • They shun advances in technology
  • They don’t collaborate with each other

These are self-inflicted wounds that happen more frequently than they should. It’s a shame. The core issue is that we shouldn’t be seeing so many empty storefronts, at least not the ones that can be controlled. It’s bad for the towns, the business owners, and the customers. People want to get out of their cars when they drive into a town; they want to stroll the streets; and they want to spend their money. Over the coming months, I’ll examine each of these issues, with the goal of providing some guidance on what small businesses can do in our evolving world. Perhaps the towns or chambers of commerce can take a cue as well.

Rob Ciampa

Photo Credit: George Cannon

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS
Jun 20
There is great pizza and mediocre pizza. It’s that black and white – or should we say red and white? It should come as no surprise that there is a whole lot more mediocre pizza than there is great pizza. We’ll drive an hour for a great pizza, tell people about it, and keep going back for more.
A Great Pizza from Brick Pizzeria Napoletana in New Bedford, MA

A Great Pizza from Brick Pizzeria Napoletana in New Bedford, MA

And there is great marketing and mediocre marketing. It’s that red and white too. We like great marketing as much as we like great pizza. It’s a shame that there’s not more of the great stuff, but you’ll easily find an endless buffet of the mediocrity that looks the same, smells the same, and tastes the same. I’m talking about both pizza and marketing.

What’s the problem? It’s simple. In pizza making, anyone can make dough, add tomato sauce, throw on some cheese, and bake a 16 inch pie. In marketing, anyone can create collateral, add it to a website, throw on some email, and bake a campaign.

If we all have access to the same resources for marketing or pizza, then why do we have this dichotomy of great and mediocre? There are two things that make the difference: the ingredients and the baker. Let’s look at each from a marketing perspective.

Marketing ingredients. Great, compelling, differentiated content is mandatory. Why? Because bad cheese tastes like plastic. And bad content smells like bad cheese. So, why do so many marketing organizations produce such bad content? I’ll argue that many marketers really don’t know their products, their customers, or their markets. I’ve made this case before. This is our farm, our dairy, our mill; this is where we get our ingredients.

Marketing Baker. The true pizza artisan is known as a pizzaiolo. Great ingredients don’t guarantee great results. That’s where the pizzaiolo comes in. He or she picks the ingredients, blends them in creative ways, and delivers an extraordinary customer experience.

So, does your marketing organization seem like a second-rate pizza joint? Is the “marketing pizza” undifferentiated and uninspired? Want to be great? You better take a hard look at the ingredients and the people in the kitchen. Before you pull out the pizza cutter, remember that producing unforgettable results starts at the top. Yes, dear CEO, that means you. If you can’t differentiate between great and mediocre, don’t be surprised when your prospects and customers can. Go get some great ingredients and find a sensational pizzaiolo.

Rob Ciampa

P.S. Check out The Two Palaverer post on a great pizza establishment in New Bedford, MA.

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS
Tagged with:
Apr 17

Monkey Mayhem

“You’ve got to be kidding me,” I exclaimed while leading a marketing team on a walk through of an existing marketing automation system. “The lead nurturing content is wrong and the landing pages don’t align with the message.”

“Where’s the documentation and the process for this?” I asked.

“We don’t have any.  A consultant did it.”

“What about the messaging? Let’s look at the assumptions.”

“We hired another firm to do that.”

Sigh. “OK, then let’s fix the landing pages. We’ll modify the message and the call-to-action. And the graphics, we’ll need to make some modifications.”

“We can’t. We don’t have any of the Adobe tools to do it. Besides, if we did, we wouldn’t know how to use them. We only have the JPG, GIF, and PNG graphics files.”

“You didn’t get the source files as part of the contract?”

“Nope.”

“Where’s the designer?”

“Don’t know. He was a freelancer and his Comcast email and cell number don’t work.”

I’d like to think this saga is unique, but I hear it regularly from my marketing and executive colleagues. Over the past decade, many of us have had to either make deep cuts in our organizations or significantly increase our productivity without a comparable change in staffing or resources. It’s the nature of our business and the more astute managers will adapt, often through outsourcing and contract help.

But outsourcing doesn’t mean you abdicate competence. A marketing manager or executive must have a grasp of what’s being outsourced and retain ownership and understanding. One of the finest courses I took in graduate school was “Business Law.” On the first day of class, Professor Susan Samuelson addressed the class:

You are not here to be lawyers: you are here to be good clients, which requires an understanding of the basics of law so you can make intelligent decisions.

True for business law, true for marketing, and true for other professions. If you don’t understand what you’re outsourcing, then how can you gauge the results? Marketing outsourcing will remain a critical part of our operations, but be sure to keep competency in house.

Rob Ciampa

Photo Credit: Eric Ward

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS
Tagged with:
Jan 24

Demolishing SchoolDuring a recent drive through my hometown, I noticed that my junior high school (or middle school in today’s vernacular) had been replaced by an entirely new building. I was rather surprised because the old structure was built like a tank. Curious, I asked some of my local friends why the old school was razed. “We needed an elementary school.” “Asbestos.” “Needed a new roof.” “It was old.” “Was time for a better learning environment.” The last one caught me because I’ve heard that issue in many towns in which I lived.

There seems to be a recurring theme that children will learn better when they’re sitting in a contemporary school with all the modern amenities. I’m sure there is some truth to that, but I decided to reflect upon my own education. What stood out? Not the buildings. What stood out were the great teachers. Though I can still somewhat envision my school buildings, I very clearly hear the voices and lessons of many of my teachers.

When communities raze older schools with the aim of improving education, they’re frequently missing the mark. Of course everyone acts surprised when the subsequent standardized test scores don’t go up. (“But we have such a beautiful new campus.”) Communities and school systems should focus on developing excellent teachers if they want to improve learning. That’s the essence of education.

Those of us in business witness similar effects. We do our own razing, which we call “reorganization.” Too often we reorganize with the hope of bringing about transformations in the business. Like the standardized test scores, the business results are often unchanged. And everyone acts surprised. Organizations should focus on developing excellent leaders if they want to improve performance. That’s the essence of business.

For both business and education, it’s about leadership first, jackhammers second.

Rob Ciampa

Photo Credit: Jef Nickerson

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS
Tagged with:
Oct 31
Joe Paterno Penn State ChampionshipProduct Launch.  Mention that to any savvy marketing person and you’ll likely get an interesting reaction that reflects a blend of euphoria and post traumatic stress disorder. As contemporary marketers, we do many things during the regular season – positioning, branding, demand generation, etc. – but we live for the post season when we bring products to market. Unlike professional sports, our postseason begins with a loud bang and then goes on for a while. Though it may be several months before we know whether we’ve taken the championship, we do have a good sense of the outcome early on.

Any launch is an exercise in planning, timing, creativity, and improvisation. Legacy marketers may shudder at the last element, but the need to improvise is often the key to a successful launch.  Recently, while wrapping up an international product launch, I stopped by a bookstore at the airport in Frankfurt, Germany. By habit, I went over to the business section and began thumbing through a marketing book, one that was published by a well-known business magazine. It positioned marketing as some orderly, recipe-structured process: just follow these steps and you’ll be successful with your products. Trying to be open minded and warding off a visceral, negative reaction, I thumbed through a few more chapters. No change on my end; the author clearly spent his time on the bench and hadn’t experienced action on the field when the best laid plans don’t work and require organizations to think on their feet and improvise.

Good marketing does require good planning, but great marketing adds real-time, event-driven tactical response, which may well decide the championship. Sure, you can have a detailed and exhaustive playbook, but what if your competition (or your customers) don’t fit into a play? You can’t run back to the locker room. Be good with your playbook, but be great with your improvisation on the field.

Rob Ciampa

Photo Credit: The Pennsylvania State University

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS
Tagged with:
Aug 15

My parents, like most, always had a repertoire of sayings that they used to keep their wayward children moving in the right direction. My father used to frequently say: “Tell me who your friends are and I’ll tell you who you are.” My mother had a similar one: “You are who you hang out with.” Like many kids, I had my good friends and I had my share of not-so-good friends. Sometimes the latter were a bit more stimulating, which likely led to my parents’ concern.

EnronFast forward many years and the concept still holds, this time in business. No company is an island: many organizations rely on business partners for sales, distribution, marketing, integration, etc. These are our business “friends” and they are a reflection on/of our company. It doesn’t matter if we’re a large multinational or a regional non-profit.

When they add value, it’s brand harmony; when they don’t it’s brand dissonance, which can cause customers to walk. Unfortunately, there is reluctance to mute this dissonance until it’s too late. Why? Trepidation, perceived risk, ignorance. Remember: your bad corporate friends make you look bad. Period.

Many years ago I started what eventually became a large, cutting-edge, worldwide IT services firm. Some early, successful projects with E*TRADE put us on the map and helped us establish a solid and strong brand. We subsequently added some great partners such as Cisco and did great things with them around the world. Our brand became even stronger.

Then came a new “friend,” Enron. We partnered with them to use their infrastructure as a foundation for what was to become one the world’s most powerful and advanced video-on-demand networks. Today, we take video-on-demand for granted, but since we were doing one of the first large-scale networks, it was a challenge. Blockbuster, the video rental rock star, was also in the the mix as the content provider. This had all the characteristics to be one of the greatest IT projects of all time. Unfortunately, Enron was not a good business friend and they were making us look bad – to Blockbuster, to Cisco, and to the many other organizations associated with the project.

We tried to turn them into a good partner, but remember, before their fall, Enron was occupying Mount Olympus. They were business gods and had the hubris to go with it, not to mention they were jeopardizing the project. Blockbuster was screaming. Cisco was screaming. Our employees were screaming from abuse. We had to make a decision and we did: we walked. We walked away from an incredible opportunity. We had to.  We did it for our employees, our other partners, and our brand. The dissonance was deafening, but it was the right thing to do.

All organizations should take regular inventory of their partnerships and listen for brand dissonance. If something doesn’t seem right, don’t tune it out. Take action or the market certainly will. You are who you hang with. My parents were right.

Rob

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS
Tagged with:
May 29
Leeville, LA 2007

Leeville, Louisiana

In 1998, while living north of Boston, I co-founded an internet services company in Atlanta. The following year, when the venture got traction, my family and I left New England, moved to the South, and began a new chapter in our lives. For the next eight years, when not consumed with work, I explored much of the region with my family.

Moving from the Northeast was quite a change, but not for the typical reasons. For us, we gave up regional character, culture and cuisine. For those of you who read the blog I write with my wife, The Two Palaverers, you know why I borrowed that alliteration.  Immediately, we began our quest to discover what we left a thousand miles behind. Happily over time, we found it in places like Charleston, South Carolina, Savannah, Georgia, and Natchez, Mississippi, but we knew we hit the jackpot with Louisiana.

For years, we made many visits to Louisiana, exploring much of the state. Each trip offered a different, more stimulating experience, whether it was eating alligator in Lafayette, watching a Sunday service procession along the Mississippi River south of Baton Rouge, or listening to an emerging jazz trio near Tulane University. Louisiana has soul.

Bayou Farewell by Mike TidwellIn 2004, at a local bookstore in Atlanta, I came across a book called Bayou Farewell by Mike Tidwell. Because my reading queue was continuing to expand, I resisted the purchase, but returned the following day and bought it, putting it at the front of my reading list. A few days later it was read. From the start, Tidwell hypnotized me with his chronicle of the people south of New Orleans in Cajun country and on the Gulf. He methodically navigated such diverse subjects as culture, shrimpers, boat maintenance – and oil. He successfully captured the essence of this part of Louisiana.

Not long after reading the book, I retraced many of Tidwell’s paths through Cajun country and such small towns as Leeville, Galliano, and Golden Meadow. The more I saw, the more I was convinced – and concerned – by how ecologically fragile this region was. Decades of silt loss from the Mississippi and pipeline runs through the swampland were having a range of effects from land erosion to wetland depletion.

Today, we’re all shocked by the endless flow of oil and images from the massive leak in the Gulf. Oil from this region is important to both the people of Lousisiana and the rest of us around the country. I’m sure we’ll have more insight to the cause as the seepage stops. Like every catastrophe, I expect there to be no shortage of warning signs ignored. We won’t know the ultimate impact on the inhabitants or environment for some time. Hurricane Katrina knocked Louisiana down, but it survived. This oil spill, though, is different. I hope it’s not Bayou Farewell.

Rob Ciampa

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS
Tagged with:
preload preload preload